1984, Ages 13 and Up
Gather round and I’ll tell you the tale of two princes—one wrongfully accused of murder, the other manipulated by an evil magician.
(1/2/26)
Gather round and I’ll tell you the tale of two princes—one wrongfully accused of murder, the other manipulated by an evil magician.
(1/2/26)
On page 12 of his art book, The Goblins of Labyrinth, Brian Froud provides the following description of the goblin artist Püg “(pronounced, for no apparent reason, ‘guppie’)”:
“His early canvases—such as The Death and Destruction of a Million Goblins of Uncertain Dispositions or his widely acclaimed Heads Being Banged by Something Big and Horrible—were wildly popular amongst goblins of all types and dimensions. His popularity began to wane, however, as he moved onto more experimental and—to the goblin mind—more controversial subjects, such as Several Beautiful Princesses Enjoying a Wonderful Picnic Under the Most Pleasant Circumstances or the much-reviled Happy Goblins Being Pleasant to Someone Who Was Kind to Them.”
Now, obviously, this is played for laughs. In all seriousness, though, it is rather sad when an established artist, whether to expand creative horizons or for more personal reasons, creates something vastly different in style from their usual work, only for fans to reject it or never give it a chance despite its own unique merits.
What if I were to tell you this very thing happened to the King of Horror himself?
In the fair kingdom of Delain, the flawed but well-meaning King Roland has sired two sons. Peter, the first-born, is everything a fairy-tale prince and heir to the throne should be: handsome, wise, brave, and strong. Second-born Thomas, however, is not: clumsy, sickly, slow-witted, and ever stuck in his elder brother’s shadow. His bitter jealousy of Peter’s achievements does not go unnoticed by Roland’s court magician, Flagg, who despises the royal family and seeks the ruination of Delain. A few well-planted grains of Dragon Sand, the deadliest of all poisons, leaves King Roland in the agonizing throes of a fiery death, Peter framed and condemned to rot in Delain’s tallest tower, and the newly crowned Thomas to be controlled like the weak and frightened puppet Flagg has raised him to be. But unbeknownst to the evil sorcerer, the two brothers each harbor a devastating secret: a desperate plan that could free Peter from his prison without, and a haunting memory that could free Thomas from his own within.
King wrote and dedicated Eyes to his daughter Naomi, who requested a fantasy story from him as she preferred dragons over horror. Upon publication, however, many established fans were quick to snub the book both because of its younger target audience and its lack of King’s trademark horror elements. In fact, as of writing, except for 1977’s Rage and 1981’s Roadwork, this is his oldest novel to have received no kind of adaptation whatsoever. But this cool reception and his feeling stuck writing in the horror genre did help inspire the creation of King’s next iconic novel, Misery, about a deranged woman keeping her favorite author hostage for daring to kill off her favorite character to move on to other stories. So . . . without The Eyes of the Dragon, we would never have gotten the gift of Annie Wilkes in all her psychotic, “hobbling” glory. Take that for what it’s worth! ;)
While I’m not the biggest King fan—shocking, I know—it would be too simplistic for me to say I like this book more than his others just because it’s a fantasy. Much of it is generational: I have a much harder time understanding his plentiful 70’s and early 80’s pop culture references than I do fairy tale-like stories which are universal by design. So much the better to appreciate King’s omniscient narrator. They remind me of John Hurt as the titular Jim Henson’s the Storyteller, but with a seasoned voice more appropriate for a maturing teen audience. As modest as they are shrewd, this anonymous teller of tales addresses, informs and entertains the reader in a way that invites them to think of the characters as more than mere players on a make-believe stage:
“Perhaps you are wondering what Thomas was like, and some of you may already be casting him in a villain’s part, as a willing co-schemer in Flagg’s plot to snatch the crown from its rightful owner.
This was not really the case at all, although to some it always seemed so, and of course Thomas did play a part. He did not seem, I admit, to be a really good boy—at least, not at first glance. He was surely not a good boy in the way that Peter was a good boy, but no brother would have looked really good beside Peter, and Thomas knew it well by the time he was four [. . .]
The part Thomas played in his brother’s imprisonment was dishonorable, but even so he was not a really bad boy. I believe this, and hope that in time you will come to believe it, too.” (Pg. 52-54)
Speaking of major players: This is in fact Flagg’s second appearance after debuting as Randell Flagg in 1978’s The Stand. King would bring new malevolent versions of him into future stories like The Dark Tower series, Hearts in Atlantis, and Gwendy’s Button Box trilogy. This is the only Flagg story I’ve experienced as of writing, so I can’t make any comparisons regarding his other depictions. All I can say here is that he plays the role of the classic evil wizard with handsome demonic skill and elegance. His ability to read and manipulate people as easily as his copy of Lovecraft’s Necronomicon is what enables him to cause destruction with the swift and invisible indifference of a plague:
“He had come to Delain from Garlan in the time of Roland’s grandfather. In those days he had appeared to be a thin and stern-faced man of about forty. Now, in the closing years of Roland’s reign, he appeared to be a thin and stern-faced man of about fifty. Yet it had not been ten years, or even twenty, between then and now—it had been seventy-six years in all. [. . .]
[. . .]
Who was he, really, this dark man?
I do not know.
[. . .]
What did he want? That question I think I can answer.
He wanted what evil men always want: to have power and use that power to make mischief. Being a King did not interest him because the heads of Kings all too often found their way to spikes on castle walls when things went wrong. But the advisors to Kings . . . the spinners in the shadows . . . such people usually melted away like evening shadows at dawning as soon as the headsman’s axe started to fall. Flagg was a sickness, a fever looking for a cool brow to heat up. He hooded his actions just as he hooded his face. And when the great trouble came—as it always did after a span of years—Flagg always disappeared like shadows at dawn. Later, when the carnage was over and the fever had passed, when the rebuilding was complete and there was again something worth destroying, Flagg would appear once more.” (Pg. 60-63)
From what little I’ve read, several of King’s human characters—good and evil alike—are often a combination of alcoholic, depressed, or dealing with some albeit important but otherwise mundane personal issues. This makes sense, of course, considering his own history with alcohol and cocaine addiction. Nevertheless, it really is refreshing to see him write a character who embodies humanity at its noble and heroic. Peter, though just as realistically imperfect as any boy or man in a Stephen King novel, is one of those rare souls whose innate kingly virtues are apparent to literally everyone. Consider the scene from the 1959 religious epic Bun-Hur, in which Jesus Christ, with nothing but a gaze, brings comfort and joy to a beaten, water-deprived Judah, while making the bullying Roman soldiers think twice and back off. Likewise, Peter’s bearing alone is enough to humble even the most hardened and cynical of hearts:
“‘Who told you to kill this horse?’ he asked.
Yosef, a hardy and robust sixty, was a palace fixture. He was not apt to brook the interference of a snot-nosed brat easily, prince or no. He fixed Peter with a thunderous, heavy look that was meant to wilt the boy. Peter, then just nine, reddened, but did not wilt.
[. . .]
‘My father, and his father before him, and his father before him,’ Yosef said, seeing now that he was going to have to say something, like it or not. ‘That’s who told me to kill it. A horse with a broken leg is no good to any living thing, least of all to itself.’
[. . .]
He raised the maul in both hands.
‘Put it down,’ Peter said.
Yosef was thunderstruck. He had never been interfered with in such a way.
‘Here! Here! What are you a-saying?’
‘You heard me. I said put that hammer down.’ As he said these words Peter’s voice deepened. Yosef suddenly realized—really, really, realized—that it was the future King standing here in this dusty stableyard, commanding him. If Peter had actually said as much—if he had stood there in the dust squeaking, Put that down, put it down, I said, I’m going to be King someday, King, do you hear, so you put that down!, Yosef would have laughed contemptuously, spat, and ended the broken-legged horse’s life with one hard swing of his deeply muscled arms. But Peter did not have to say any such thing; the command was clear in his voice and eyes.” (Pg 45-46)
“Peter smiled for the first time since he had come to this cold, high place. His cheeks and chin were shadowed with the beginnings of a beard which would grow full and long in these two drafty rooms, and he looked quite a desperate character . . . until he smiled. The smile lit his face with magical power, made it strong and radiant, a beacon to which one could imagine soldiers rallying in battle.
[. . .]
The warders saw that smile and made no more jokes. There was something about it which forbade joking.” (Pg. 214)
And poor Thomas’ inferiority complex festers before this apparent demi-godhood. Even the perverse opportunity, courtesy of Flagg, to spy on his Peter-worshiping father through the glass eyes of a taxidermized dragon—hence the novel’s title—is soured by the hypocrisy of the latter’s disgusting drunkenness. Then, suddenly, Thomas is crowned for no other reason than one king is dead and another is incarcerated. Who cares if the new responsibility leaves him physically ill and at Flagg’s honey-tongued mercy? That Thomas feels some validation at last is cheap because it hasn’t been earned, petty because he thinks it has, and tragic because, after all this time watching him being second-rate, one still may not help but feel happy for him in a pitying sort of way:
“Thomas heeded Flagg’s advice not to go often, but he did use the passageway from time to time, and peeked at his father through the glass eyes of Niner [. . .] And perhaps Flagg’s instinct for mischief in this matter was not so bad at all, because by spying on his father, Thomas learned to feel a new thing for Roland. Before he knew about the secret passage he had felt love for him, and often a sorrow that he could not please him better, and sometimes fear. Now he learned to feel contempt, as well.
[. . .]
Thomas would slide the little panels back after a while and slink down the corridor again, his head pounding and an uneasy grin on his face—the head and grin of a boy who has been eating green apples and knows he may be sicker by morning than his is now.
This was the father he had always loved and feared?
He was an old man who farted out stinking clouds of steam.
This was the King his loyal subjects called Roland the Good?
He [p***ed] into the fire, sending up more clouds of steam.
This was the man who made his heart break by not liking his boat?
He talked to the stuffed heads on his walls, calling them silly names like Bonsey and Stag-Pool and Puckerstring. [. . .]
I don’t care for you anymore, Thomas would think, checking the peephole to make sure the corridor was empty and then creeping back to his room like a felon. You’re a filthy, silly old man and you’re nothing to me! Nothing at all! No!” (Pg. 96-98)
“Flagg took Thomas’s arm. In the years to come, it was a posture the inhabitants of the court city would become very familiar with—Flagg appearing to bear the boy King up as if he were an old man instead of a healthy youngster.
[. . .]
A cheer so great it was like the sound of surf breaking against the long, desolate strands of the Eastern Barony greeted their coming. Thomas looked around, amazed at the sound, and his first thought was: Where is Peter? Surely this must be for Peter! Then he remembered that Peter was in the Needle and realized the cheering was for him. He felt a dawning pleasure . . . and I must tell you that the pleasure was not just in knowing the cheers were for him. He knew that Peter, locked in his lonely tower rooms, must hear the cheering, too.
What does it matter now that you were always best in lessons? Thomas thought with a mean happiness that pricked him even as it warmed him. What does it matter now? You are locked in the Needle and I . . . I am to be King! [. . .]
[. . .]
[. . .] He couldn’t see if Peter was looking down, but he hoped Peter was. He hoped Peter was looking down and biting his lips in frustration until the blood flowed down his chin, as Thomas had often bitten his own lips—bitten them until there was a fine white network of scars there.
Do you hear that, Peter? he shrilled in his mind. They’re cheering for ME! They’re cheering for ME! They’re finally cheering for ME!” (Pg. 162-164)
Even after reading some of his more traditional works and long before becoming spoiled on the more creatively grotesque fare of Clive Barker and Junji Ito, I still think Stephen King is overrated, but I do respect him greatly. And even if I didn’t, I honestly do think his earlier readers’ opinions were premature on this one. Though no Hobbit or Harry Potter, let alone Carrie or Cujo, The Eyes of the Dragon is a straightforward but enthralling medieval tale of good vs. evil. Consider how much non-horror King has written in the years since and give this early experiment a spot in the fire light.
CREDITS:
Special thanks to KTWH 99.5 Two Harbors Community Radio. All images, audio, and links belong to their respective owners; no copyright infringement is intended.
Except where noted, all book excerpts are from The Eyes of the Dragon by Stephen King (circa-2001 paperback edition; published by Signet, an imprint of New American Library, a division of Penguin Putnam Inc.)
MAIN THEME:
“The Call” - Briand Morrison and Roxann Berglund
https://www.briandmorrison.com/
https://www.facebook.com/BriandMorrisonGuitar/
https://www.youtube.com/user/briandmorrison
“His early canvases—such as The Death and Destruction of a Million Goblins of Uncertain Dispositions or his widely acclaimed Heads Being Banged by Something Big and Horrible—were wildly popular amongst goblins of all types and dimensions. His popularity began to wane, however, as he moved onto more experimental and—to the goblin mind—more controversial subjects, such as Several Beautiful Princesses Enjoying a Wonderful Picnic Under the Most Pleasant Circumstances or the much-reviled Happy Goblins Being Pleasant to Someone Who Was Kind to Them.”
Now, obviously, this is played for laughs. In all seriousness, though, it is rather sad when an established artist, whether to expand creative horizons or for more personal reasons, creates something vastly different in style from their usual work, only for fans to reject it or never give it a chance despite its own unique merits.
What if I were to tell you this very thing happened to the King of Horror himself?
In the fair kingdom of Delain, the flawed but well-meaning King Roland has sired two sons. Peter, the first-born, is everything a fairy-tale prince and heir to the throne should be: handsome, wise, brave, and strong. Second-born Thomas, however, is not: clumsy, sickly, slow-witted, and ever stuck in his elder brother’s shadow. His bitter jealousy of Peter’s achievements does not go unnoticed by Roland’s court magician, Flagg, who despises the royal family and seeks the ruination of Delain. A few well-planted grains of Dragon Sand, the deadliest of all poisons, leaves King Roland in the agonizing throes of a fiery death, Peter framed and condemned to rot in Delain’s tallest tower, and the newly crowned Thomas to be controlled like the weak and frightened puppet Flagg has raised him to be. But unbeknownst to the evil sorcerer, the two brothers each harbor a devastating secret: a desperate plan that could free Peter from his prison without, and a haunting memory that could free Thomas from his own within.
King wrote and dedicated Eyes to his daughter Naomi, who requested a fantasy story from him as she preferred dragons over horror. Upon publication, however, many established fans were quick to snub the book both because of its younger target audience and its lack of King’s trademark horror elements. In fact, as of writing, except for 1977’s Rage and 1981’s Roadwork, this is his oldest novel to have received no kind of adaptation whatsoever. But this cool reception and his feeling stuck writing in the horror genre did help inspire the creation of King’s next iconic novel, Misery, about a deranged woman keeping her favorite author hostage for daring to kill off her favorite character to move on to other stories. So . . . without The Eyes of the Dragon, we would never have gotten the gift of Annie Wilkes in all her psychotic, “hobbling” glory. Take that for what it’s worth! ;)
While I’m not the biggest King fan—shocking, I know—it would be too simplistic for me to say I like this book more than his others just because it’s a fantasy. Much of it is generational: I have a much harder time understanding his plentiful 70’s and early 80’s pop culture references than I do fairy tale-like stories which are universal by design. So much the better to appreciate King’s omniscient narrator. They remind me of John Hurt as the titular Jim Henson’s the Storyteller, but with a seasoned voice more appropriate for a maturing teen audience. As modest as they are shrewd, this anonymous teller of tales addresses, informs and entertains the reader in a way that invites them to think of the characters as more than mere players on a make-believe stage:
“Perhaps you are wondering what Thomas was like, and some of you may already be casting him in a villain’s part, as a willing co-schemer in Flagg’s plot to snatch the crown from its rightful owner.
This was not really the case at all, although to some it always seemed so, and of course Thomas did play a part. He did not seem, I admit, to be a really good boy—at least, not at first glance. He was surely not a good boy in the way that Peter was a good boy, but no brother would have looked really good beside Peter, and Thomas knew it well by the time he was four [. . .]
The part Thomas played in his brother’s imprisonment was dishonorable, but even so he was not a really bad boy. I believe this, and hope that in time you will come to believe it, too.” (Pg. 52-54)
Speaking of major players: This is in fact Flagg’s second appearance after debuting as Randell Flagg in 1978’s The Stand. King would bring new malevolent versions of him into future stories like The Dark Tower series, Hearts in Atlantis, and Gwendy’s Button Box trilogy. This is the only Flagg story I’ve experienced as of writing, so I can’t make any comparisons regarding his other depictions. All I can say here is that he plays the role of the classic evil wizard with handsome demonic skill and elegance. His ability to read and manipulate people as easily as his copy of Lovecraft’s Necronomicon is what enables him to cause destruction with the swift and invisible indifference of a plague:
“He had come to Delain from Garlan in the time of Roland’s grandfather. In those days he had appeared to be a thin and stern-faced man of about forty. Now, in the closing years of Roland’s reign, he appeared to be a thin and stern-faced man of about fifty. Yet it had not been ten years, or even twenty, between then and now—it had been seventy-six years in all. [. . .]
[. . .]
Who was he, really, this dark man?
I do not know.
[. . .]
What did he want? That question I think I can answer.
He wanted what evil men always want: to have power and use that power to make mischief. Being a King did not interest him because the heads of Kings all too often found their way to spikes on castle walls when things went wrong. But the advisors to Kings . . . the spinners in the shadows . . . such people usually melted away like evening shadows at dawning as soon as the headsman’s axe started to fall. Flagg was a sickness, a fever looking for a cool brow to heat up. He hooded his actions just as he hooded his face. And when the great trouble came—as it always did after a span of years—Flagg always disappeared like shadows at dawn. Later, when the carnage was over and the fever had passed, when the rebuilding was complete and there was again something worth destroying, Flagg would appear once more.” (Pg. 60-63)
From what little I’ve read, several of King’s human characters—good and evil alike—are often a combination of alcoholic, depressed, or dealing with some albeit important but otherwise mundane personal issues. This makes sense, of course, considering his own history with alcohol and cocaine addiction. Nevertheless, it really is refreshing to see him write a character who embodies humanity at its noble and heroic. Peter, though just as realistically imperfect as any boy or man in a Stephen King novel, is one of those rare souls whose innate kingly virtues are apparent to literally everyone. Consider the scene from the 1959 religious epic Bun-Hur, in which Jesus Christ, with nothing but a gaze, brings comfort and joy to a beaten, water-deprived Judah, while making the bullying Roman soldiers think twice and back off. Likewise, Peter’s bearing alone is enough to humble even the most hardened and cynical of hearts:
“‘Who told you to kill this horse?’ he asked.
Yosef, a hardy and robust sixty, was a palace fixture. He was not apt to brook the interference of a snot-nosed brat easily, prince or no. He fixed Peter with a thunderous, heavy look that was meant to wilt the boy. Peter, then just nine, reddened, but did not wilt.
[. . .]
‘My father, and his father before him, and his father before him,’ Yosef said, seeing now that he was going to have to say something, like it or not. ‘That’s who told me to kill it. A horse with a broken leg is no good to any living thing, least of all to itself.’
[. . .]
He raised the maul in both hands.
‘Put it down,’ Peter said.
Yosef was thunderstruck. He had never been interfered with in such a way.
‘Here! Here! What are you a-saying?’
‘You heard me. I said put that hammer down.’ As he said these words Peter’s voice deepened. Yosef suddenly realized—really, really, realized—that it was the future King standing here in this dusty stableyard, commanding him. If Peter had actually said as much—if he had stood there in the dust squeaking, Put that down, put it down, I said, I’m going to be King someday, King, do you hear, so you put that down!, Yosef would have laughed contemptuously, spat, and ended the broken-legged horse’s life with one hard swing of his deeply muscled arms. But Peter did not have to say any such thing; the command was clear in his voice and eyes.” (Pg 45-46)
“Peter smiled for the first time since he had come to this cold, high place. His cheeks and chin were shadowed with the beginnings of a beard which would grow full and long in these two drafty rooms, and he looked quite a desperate character . . . until he smiled. The smile lit his face with magical power, made it strong and radiant, a beacon to which one could imagine soldiers rallying in battle.
[. . .]
The warders saw that smile and made no more jokes. There was something about it which forbade joking.” (Pg. 214)
And poor Thomas’ inferiority complex festers before this apparent demi-godhood. Even the perverse opportunity, courtesy of Flagg, to spy on his Peter-worshiping father through the glass eyes of a taxidermized dragon—hence the novel’s title—is soured by the hypocrisy of the latter’s disgusting drunkenness. Then, suddenly, Thomas is crowned for no other reason than one king is dead and another is incarcerated. Who cares if the new responsibility leaves him physically ill and at Flagg’s honey-tongued mercy? That Thomas feels some validation at last is cheap because it hasn’t been earned, petty because he thinks it has, and tragic because, after all this time watching him being second-rate, one still may not help but feel happy for him in a pitying sort of way:
“Thomas heeded Flagg’s advice not to go often, but he did use the passageway from time to time, and peeked at his father through the glass eyes of Niner [. . .] And perhaps Flagg’s instinct for mischief in this matter was not so bad at all, because by spying on his father, Thomas learned to feel a new thing for Roland. Before he knew about the secret passage he had felt love for him, and often a sorrow that he could not please him better, and sometimes fear. Now he learned to feel contempt, as well.
[. . .]
Thomas would slide the little panels back after a while and slink down the corridor again, his head pounding and an uneasy grin on his face—the head and grin of a boy who has been eating green apples and knows he may be sicker by morning than his is now.
This was the father he had always loved and feared?
He was an old man who farted out stinking clouds of steam.
This was the King his loyal subjects called Roland the Good?
He [p***ed] into the fire, sending up more clouds of steam.
This was the man who made his heart break by not liking his boat?
He talked to the stuffed heads on his walls, calling them silly names like Bonsey and Stag-Pool and Puckerstring. [. . .]
I don’t care for you anymore, Thomas would think, checking the peephole to make sure the corridor was empty and then creeping back to his room like a felon. You’re a filthy, silly old man and you’re nothing to me! Nothing at all! No!” (Pg. 96-98)
“Flagg took Thomas’s arm. In the years to come, it was a posture the inhabitants of the court city would become very familiar with—Flagg appearing to bear the boy King up as if he were an old man instead of a healthy youngster.
[. . .]
A cheer so great it was like the sound of surf breaking against the long, desolate strands of the Eastern Barony greeted their coming. Thomas looked around, amazed at the sound, and his first thought was: Where is Peter? Surely this must be for Peter! Then he remembered that Peter was in the Needle and realized the cheering was for him. He felt a dawning pleasure . . . and I must tell you that the pleasure was not just in knowing the cheers were for him. He knew that Peter, locked in his lonely tower rooms, must hear the cheering, too.
What does it matter now that you were always best in lessons? Thomas thought with a mean happiness that pricked him even as it warmed him. What does it matter now? You are locked in the Needle and I . . . I am to be King! [. . .]
[. . .]
[. . .] He couldn’t see if Peter was looking down, but he hoped Peter was. He hoped Peter was looking down and biting his lips in frustration until the blood flowed down his chin, as Thomas had often bitten his own lips—bitten them until there was a fine white network of scars there.
Do you hear that, Peter? he shrilled in his mind. They’re cheering for ME! They’re cheering for ME! They’re finally cheering for ME!” (Pg. 162-164)
Even after reading some of his more traditional works and long before becoming spoiled on the more creatively grotesque fare of Clive Barker and Junji Ito, I still think Stephen King is overrated, but I do respect him greatly. And even if I didn’t, I honestly do think his earlier readers’ opinions were premature on this one. Though no Hobbit or Harry Potter, let alone Carrie or Cujo, The Eyes of the Dragon is a straightforward but enthralling medieval tale of good vs. evil. Consider how much non-horror King has written in the years since and give this early experiment a spot in the fire light.
CREDITS:
Special thanks to KTWH 99.5 Two Harbors Community Radio. All images, audio, and links belong to their respective owners; no copyright infringement is intended.
Except where noted, all book excerpts are from The Eyes of the Dragon by Stephen King (circa-2001 paperback edition; published by Signet, an imprint of New American Library, a division of Penguin Putnam Inc.)
MAIN THEME:
“The Call” - Briand Morrison and Roxann Berglund
https://www.briandmorrison.com/
https://www.facebook.com/BriandMorrisonGuitar/
https://www.youtube.com/user/briandmorrison
EPISODE SONGS:
“Heart of Hellfire” - Alex Nelson
https://www.facebook.com/alex.j.nelson.7
“Heart of Hellfire” - Alex Nelson
https://www.facebook.com/alex.j.nelson.7
“Secret Passage” – Sean Zarn
https://www.facebook.com/sean.zarn
https://www.facebook.com/sean.zarn
Download the full 15-minute episode here!
Stephen King on Wikipedia
The Eyes of the Dragon on Wikipedia
The Eyes of the Dragon on Stephen King's Official Website
The Eyes of the Dragon on Fandom
The Eyes of the Dragon on Goodreads
The Eyes of the Dragon on Tv Tropes
The Eyes of the Dragon at Barnes & Noble
The Eyes of the Dragon on Amazon
The Eyes of the Dragon on eBay
^^ Back to Books, Graphic Novels, and Other Works of Literature
Stephen King on Wikipedia
The Eyes of the Dragon on Wikipedia
The Eyes of the Dragon on Stephen King's Official Website
The Eyes of the Dragon on Fandom
The Eyes of the Dragon on Goodreads
The Eyes of the Dragon on Tv Tropes
The Eyes of the Dragon at Barnes & Noble
The Eyes of the Dragon on Amazon
The Eyes of the Dragon on eBay
^^ Back to Books, Graphic Novels, and Other Works of Literature
RSS Feed